Arama Sonuçları

Ana Sayfa
   
Pleksus Medline
Hakkımızda
İstatistikler
İndekslenen Dergiler
İletişim
Teşekkürler
Medline Servisleri
Gelişmiş Arama
Makale Arama
Dergi Arama
İlgili Kaynaklar
Yazar Kimdir ?
Makale Nasıl Yazılır?
Standartlar
İlgili Linkler
Ulusal Online Dergiler
PubMed
Ulaknet Ulusal Tıp Dizini
Kayıt olmak ister misiniz ?
 


   : Ücretsiz tam metin içeriği bulunan dergiler
   : Sadece elektronik yayınlanan dergiler

  1: Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2007;33(4):487-490

  ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT ANTIBIOTIC SCHEMES  

  SAKIP ERTURHAN, İLKER SEÇKİNER, FARUK YAĞCI, AHMET ERBAĞCI, MEHMET SOLAKHAN, MEHMET ÇELİK

Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Üroloji AD, GAZİANTEP

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two different prophylactic schemes for prevention to infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: Between September 2004 and December 2006, a total of 244 patients, who underwent prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA and/or suspicious finding in rectal examination, were included in this study. While ciprofloxacin plus ornidazole was given in the first 104 patients (Group 1); ceftriaxone plus ornidazole were given in the remaining 140 patients (Group 2) for prophylaxis. Results: A total of 19 infectious complications were found (14 in group 1 and 5 in group 2). Number of infectious complications in group 1 was found higher than group 2 (p=0.02). However, there was no statistically significant difference found between two groups in other complications (p>0.05). Conclusion: On the light of our findings, ceftriaxone plus ornidazole scheme is more effective in prevention of infectious complications after prostate biopsy when compared to ciprofloxacin plus ornidazole scheme.


Hepsini seç | Tümünü bırak | Seçimi çevir