Arama Sonuçları

Ana Sayfa
   
Pleksus Medline
Hakkımızda
İstatistikler
İndekslenen Dergiler
İletişim
Teşekkürler
Medline Servisleri
Gelişmiş Arama
Makale Arama
Dergi Arama
İlgili Kaynaklar
Yazar Kimdir ?
Makale Nasıl Yazılır?
Standartlar
İlgili Linkler
Ulusal Online Dergiler
PubMed
Ulaknet Ulusal Tıp Dizini
Kayıt olmak ister misiniz ?
 


   : Ücretsiz tam metin içeriği bulunan dergiler
   : Sadece elektronik yayınlanan dergiler

  1: Gazi Medical Journal 2007;18(2):78-80

  COMPARISON OF EUROSCORE AND STS (THE SOCIETY OF THORACIC SURGEONS) RISK SCORING SYSTEMS IN ISOLATED CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY  

  ÖZER KANDEMİR, MUSTAFA BÜYÜKATEŞ, S AKIN TURAN, ATAKAN ATALAY, HİLMİ TOKMAKOĞLU

Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi AD, Zonguldak

Objective: To compare the feasibility of the EuroScore and STS (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk scoring systems for predicting the surgical mortality of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery patients. Materials and Methods: The risk scoring of 148 patients who were operated on between November 2002 and December 2005 was performed prospectively according to the EuroScore and STS risk scoring systems. The predicted and observed mortality rates according to each scoring system were compared. Results: Hospital mortality was 2% (3 patients). The predicted mortality rate according to EuroScore was 3.4±2.2%, whereas it was 3.0±2.1% for STS. There were no significant differences between predicted and observed mortality rates according to either scoring system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 for EuroScore and was 0.82 for STS (p>0.05). Conclusion: Both scoring systems were efficient for predicting mortality rates for our patient population. It is an advantage of STS that it also gives valuable information about morbidity.


Hepsini seç | Tümünü bırak | Seçimi çevir